Rk3318 или s905x3 что лучше
Сравнение характеристик Android TV приставок
Android TV медиа-плееры или TV set top box очень популярны, так как позволяют поставить любое приложение на Android из магазина Google Play и смотреть IP TV, играть в игры, посмотреть фильмы с USB в видео формате до 8K, браузить в Youtube, Netflix и еще много чего. И моделей сейчас на рынке великое множество, в которых очень легко запутаться.
Стоит отметить, что сертифицированных Android приставок очень мало, большинство — китайские сборки на различных чипах. Само собой, если у вас есть деньги, то стоит брать сертифицированные приставки, такие как Xiaomi Mi box, Beelink, Zidoo, nVidia Shield, ZTE. Однако, если хочется сэкономить, то можно и на Алиэкспресс выбрать неплохие китайские варианты, например фирм Vontar или Ugoos.
К сожалению, встречается много кастрированных версий одних и тех же приставок разных производителей. Особенно среди кастратов популярен бренд Transpeed. Такие приставки используют более дешевую память, более дешёвые Wi-Fi модули, хуже спаяны и потому чаще дохнут. Кроме того, производители часто обманывают, собирая аналогичные модели на разных чипах.
Как не запутаться?
В первую очередь, смотрите на каком процессоре собрана модель: Rockchip RK3318 не берите, Amlogic S905X3 берите. Allwinner H616 и Allwinner H6 также не желательно.
Связано это с 3 причинами. RK3318 очень слабый процессор, который:
Amlogic S905X3 тоже частно выходит из строя, но по другой причине — плохая пайка процессор и их отвал. Здесь может спасти только выбор хорошего (именитого) производителя.
Allwinner H616 вроде бы достаточно надежен, но обрезан по сравнению с S905X3, тянет максимум 4К, кроме того поддерживает только 100 Мбитную проводную сеть и имеет только порт USB 2.0 на борту.
Я приведу сравнительную таблицу наиболее популярных моделей китайских приставок и их основных характеристик.
| Модель | A95X F3 Air | A95X F3 Air | X96 MAX / Max+ | X3 | X96 Mate | X3 plus | 6K |
| Бренд | Transpeed | VONTAR | VONTAR | VONTAR | VONTAR | Transpeed | Transpeed |
| ОС | Android 10,0 | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 | Android 10.0 | Android 10.0 |
| WiFI | 2,4G и 5 ГГц Double Wifi (1000M) | 2,4 & 5G Dual Wifi | 2,4 & 5G Dual Wifi | 2,4 & 5G Dual Wifi + AC | 802,11 b/g/n/AC | 802,11 b/g/n/AC | |
| BT | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| Ethernet | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с | 1000 Мбит/с | 1000 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с |
| ЦП | Amlogic S905X3 Cortex-A55 | Amlogic S905X3 | Amlogic S905X3 | Amlogic S905X3 | Allwinner H616 Cortex A53 | Amlogic S905X3 | Allwinner H616 |
| GPU | Mail-G31 MP2 | Mail-G31 MP2 | Mail-G31 MP2 | Mail-G31 MP2 | Mail-G31 MP2 | Mali-T720 | |
| Video | 8K/4K /1080P/720P/480P | 8K 24fps, 4K 60fps, | 8K @ 24fps, 4K @ 60fps | 6K @ 30fps, 4K @ 60fps, | 8K/4K /1080P/720P/480P; 8K 24fps,4K 75fps | 6K 30fps,4K 60fps, 1080p 60fps | |
| Функции | 8K 24fps,4K 75fps, HDR+, Airplay, Miracast | UHD, HDR+, DLNA/Airplay, HD 2,1 | HD 2,1; Youtube HD 4K; | HD 2,0 | 1080p 75fps, UHD, HDR+, Airplay, Miracast | HDR10, HLG,HDR | |
| USB | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Модель | X1 | X88 PRO | T95 | H96 MAX | Tanix TX6 | HK1 Max |
| Бренд | VONTAR | Transpeed | STUOTOP | VONTAR | DQiDianZ | VONTAR |
| ОС | Android 10.0 | Android 10.0 | Android 10.0 | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| WiFI | 2,4 & 5G Dual Wifi + AC | 802,11 b/g/n Dual | 802.11n | 802,11 b/g/n Dual | 2,4G / 5G (AC2X2) | 802,11 b/g/n Dual |
| BT | 5.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| Ethernet | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с |
| ЦП | Allwinner H616 | Rockchip RK3318 | H616 Quadcore cortex-A53 | Rockchip RK3318 | Allwinner H6, 1.8GHz | Rockchip RK3318 |
| GPU | Mali-G31 | Mali-450 5-ядерный | Mail-G31 MP2 | Mali-450 5-ядерный | Mali-T720 | Mali-450 5-ядерный |
| Video | 6K @ 30fps, 4K @ 60fps | 4K 60pfs | 6K @ 30 Гц | H.265, 4K 60pfs, HD 2,0 | 2K@75fps, 4K@60fps | H.265, 4K 60pfs, HD 2,0 |
| Функции | HD 2,0 | HD 2,0 | HDR10, VP9, H.265/HEVC, H.264/AVC, VC1/WMV9 | HD 2,0a; 4K VP9, 1080 P (VC-1, MPEG-1/2/4, VP6/8), HDR10 | HDMI CEC, H.264, HDCP 2,2, H.265, AVI, H.264, VC-1, DLNA, ISO файлы, Miracast, NTSC, PAL | HD 2,0a; 4K VP9, 1080 P (VC-1, MPEG-1/2/4, VP6/8), HDR10 |
| USB | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
А теперь посмотрим на сравнительные характеристики процессоров непосредственно.
| Характеристики | Rockchip | Rockchip | Rockchip |
| RK3229 | RK3328 | RK3318 | |
| SoC | 4 ядра Cortex-A7 1,5 Ггц | 4 ядра Cortex-A531,5 Ггц | 4 ядра Cortex-A531,5 Ггц |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400MP @ 400-/600 MHz | ARM Mali-450MP2 @ 500 MHz | Arm Mali-450MP3 @ 750 MHz |
| Память | DDR3-1866МГц | DDR3-1866МГц | DDR3-1866МГц |
| LPDDR3-1333 МГц | DDR3L-1866 МГц | DDR3L-1866 МГц | |
| LPDDR3-1866 МГц | LPDDR3-1866 МГц | ||
| DDR4-2133 МГц | DDR4-2133 МГц | ||
| HDMI | HDMI 2.0 | HDMI 2.0 | HDMI 2.0 |
| Video Decoder | 4K2K 10bit H265 | 4K2K 10bit H265 | 4K2K 10bit H265 |
| Video Encoder | 1080P | 1080P | 1080P |
| Порты | USB 2.0 | USB 3.0 | USB 3.0 |
| Ethernet | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с | 100 Мбит/с |
| Bluetooth | 4.0 | 04.янв | 04.янв |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac |
| OC | Android 4.4/6.0/7.1 | Android 7.1/8.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Кодеки | H265, H264 60 fps. | 4K UHD H265, H264, VP9, HDR10, HLG. | 4K UHD H265, H264, VP9, HDR10, HLG. |
Сравнение характеристик Amlogic S905X2 и S905X3
| Amlogic S905X2 | Amlogic S905X3 | |
| CPU | 4 ядра Arm Cortex-A53 с частотой 1,80 ГГц | 4 ядра Arm Cortex-A55 с частотой 1,91 ГГц |
| Neural Network Accelerator | – | Optional 1.2 TOPS NNA (поддерживает все основные структуры глубокого обучения, включая TensorFlow и Caffe) |
| GPU | Mali-G31 MP2 с OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0 и OpenCL 2.0 | |
| Всегда активный MCU | Cortex-M3 и Cortex-M4 | (Optional) Cortex-M3 и Cortex-M4 |
| RAM | DDR3-2133 / DDR3L-2133 / DDR4-2666 / LPDDR3-2133 / LPDDR4-3200 SDRAM до 4 ГБ | DDR3-2133 / DDR3L-2133 / DDR4-3200 / LPDDR3-2133 / LPDDR4-3200 SDRAM до 4 ГБ |
| Декодирование видео | H.265, VP9, AVS2 до 4K p75 10 бит H.264 4K p30 | |
| HDMI Tx | HDMI 2.1 HDCP2.2 | |
| HDR | HLG / HDR10 / 10+ Dolby Vison, TCH PRIME | |
| Процесс | 12 нм | |
| Микрофонный вход | 8 x PDM | |
| USB3.0 / PCIE | USB3.0 / PCI-E V2 (мультиплексный) | |
| Размер | 14 х 14 мм BGA | |
| Встроенный датчик температуры | да | |
Ну, и наконец, посмотрим историю развития графических чипов.
Rk3318 или s905x3 что лучше
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Amlogic S905X3 on one side and the Rockchip RK3318 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the tv box sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.9GHz. The second is used on the tv box segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Specifications:
| Processor | Amlogic S905X3 | Rockchip RK3318 |
| Market (main) | TV Box | TV Box |
| ISA | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A55 | Cortex-A53 |
| Family | S9 Gen 3 | RK3300 |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | S905X3 | RK3318 |
| Release date | Q4 2019 | Q2 2019 |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm HKMG |
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base frequency | 1.9 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | — | — |
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.91 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5 GHz |
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| Max memory capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory types | LPDDR3, LPDDR4-1066 | DDR3, DDR3L, LPDDR3, DDR4 |
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G31 MP2 | ARM Mali-450 MP5 |
| GPU execution units | 2 | 5 |
| GPU shading units | 32 | 80 |
| GPU base clock | 850 MHz | 300 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | 850 MHz | 750 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 20.8 GFLOPS | 59.5 GFLOPS |
| Socket | SoC | SoC |
| Drystone MIPS | 21,600 DMIPS | 13,800 DMIPS |
| AI accelerator | NPU, Neural Network Accelerator INT8, PPU 12.8 GFLOPS FP16, 6.4 GFLOPS FP32, 512KB L2 | — |
| AI computing operations per seconds | 1.2 TOPS | — |
| Crypto engine | AES 128/256-bit, DES, TDES, SM4, DVB-CSA, TRNG, CRC, SHA-1/SHA-2/HMAC SHA | — |
| Security | TrustZone, Secure boot, Entropy true RNG, TVP, Secured IO & clock | — |
| Max display resolution | 8K@24fps | — |
| Video decoding | H.265 8K@24fps, 4K@75fps, H.264 4K@30fps | — |
| Video encoding | H.265 1080p@60fps, H.264 1080p@30fps | — |
| Modem | 10/100/1000M Ethernet MAC, 10/100M Ethernet PHY | — |
| Connectivity | USB 2.0, USB 3.0, HDMI 2.1 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi/IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 | — |
| Audio | DAS, I2S, TDM, SPDIF, PCM, PDM | — |
| AnTuTu | 74,472 | 46,368 |
| (Android) PassMark CPU Mark | 414 | 156 |
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 773 | 522 |
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 2,128 | 1,186 |
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 132 | 92 |
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 458 | 259 |
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 5.33 GFLOPS | 6.59 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 426 pts / W | 237 pts / W |
| Amazon |  | |
| eBay |  | |
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Amlogic S905X3 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
The difference is 61%.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 165%.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
In single core, the difference is 48%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 79%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
In single core, the difference is 43%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 77%.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
See also:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.